
Friday, May 13, 2011
FRAUD ALERT RE TRADEMARKS
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
USPTO Loses $100M From Budget
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
New Copyright Brochure On-Line At USIP.COM
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
Clarification: USPTO to Begin Accepting Requests for Prioritized Examination of Patent Applications on May 4, 2011
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced plans for the agency to begin accepting requests for prioritized examination of patent applications – allowing inventors and businesses to have their patents processed within 12 months. It currently takes nearly three years to process the average patent. The program, called Track One, launches May 4, 2011, and is part of a new Three-Track system, which will provide applicants with greater control over when their applications are examined and promote greater efficiency in the patent examination process.
“Track One provides a comprehensive, flexible patent application processing model to our nation’s innovators, offering different processing options that are more responsive to the real-world needs of our applicants,” said Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO David Kappos. “The Three-Track program will bring the most important new products and services to market more quickly, helping to build businesses and create new jobs in America.”
Requests for prioritized examination will initially be limited to a maximum of 10,000 applications starting May 4, 2011 through the remainder of fiscal year 2011, ending September 30. The USPTO will revisit this limit at the end of the fiscal year to evaluate whether adjustments are needed for future years.
Filing a request for prioritized examination through Track One will include a fee under 37 CFR 1.102(e) of $4,000, in addition to filing fees for the application. For smaller entities, the USPTO is working to offer a 50 percent discount on any filing fee associated with the program, as it does with many other standard processing fees. Under 37 C.F.R. 1.102(e), prioritization is available only for an original and complete utility or plant nonprovisional application that contains or is amended to contain no more than four independent claims, no more than 30 total claims, and no multiple dependent claims. Thus far, it is not clear whether 37 C.F.R. 1.102(e) can be used for already pending applications
Under the Three-Track program, patent applicants may request prioritized examination through Track One, traditional examination under the current procedures through Track Two, and for non-continuing applications first filed with the USPTO, an applicant-controlled delay for up to 30 months prior to docketing for examination under Track Three. Track Three is expected to be available to applicants by September 30, 2011.
The Federal Register notice announcing the implementation of Track One is now available for review here. For additional background on the Three-Track program which USPTO plans to launch before the end of the fiscal year, see the initial program announcement here
Thursday, March 24, 2011
Another Big Win For Our Client!
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
U.S. Customs Making IP Protection at Border Even More Effective
- IPR holders that address legal authorities or direct action may be barred from future port training.
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 10:55 AM
Subject: Product Identification Guides
- Product identification training materials from IPR holders should neither address CBP legal authority nor offer legal opinions concerning the course of action that CBP officers should take in any particular situation.
- CBP need not have made an actual determination that a suspect product is “counterfeit” and “piratical” in order for IPR holders to use these terms in their training materials. However, when developing their training materials, IPR holders are encouraged to use terms such as “suspect” or “allegedly infringing” rather than “counterfeit” or “piratical,” where possible.
- IPR holders shall not instruct CBP officers and import specialists, either verbally or in writing, to examine, detain, or seize goods for IPR violations.
- Field offices and/or ports may exercise discretion when considering any offer of training from IPR holders. Impact on port operations, such as staffing issues, should always be considered.
- Training is to be declined if an IPR holder has not recorded their rights with CBP.
- IPR holders that address legal authorities or direct action may be barred from future port training.
- A copy of the disclaimer statement (below) is required to be attached to each copy of the product identification training materials before the materials are disseminated to field personnel.